n00bfest.com
Home Forum phpBB3 Shoutbox Servers Teamspeak Admins Donate FAQ
Sign Up
Stats Contact Us!

 

View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Sep 13, 2026 9:24 am

Forum rules


- n00bfest is not the special olympics. It is a gaming community. Do not act like n00bfest is a retard daycare or you will be punished.
- Outright flames and flamebaiting will be punished.
- Even if you are not an adult, do your best to act like one.
- *NEW* Political/Religious News and NSFW posts do not belong here. Use the Videos, Links, Political/Religious News Discussion Forum
- Punishments range from warnings to permanent forum/gameserver bans.





Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 Linux vs. Windows 

Which OS is better?
Windows 36%  36%  [ 21 ]
Windows 36%  36%  [ 21 ]
Linux 7%  7%  [ 4 ]
Linux 7%  7%  [ 4 ]
Don't know Linux 5%  5%  [ 3 ]
Don't know Linux 5%  5%  [ 3 ]
OLD SCHOOL MACINTOSH! 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
OLD SCHOOL MACINTOSH! 2%  2%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 58

 Linux vs. Windows 
Author Message
Spammer Hopeful
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 470
Location: My fro's ZipCode is 069.42
Post Linux vs. Windows
Now I don't know much about Linux, but I would like to hear reviews of actual people who have used the OS instead of website reviews. What are some of the Pros and Cons to a Linux system? I heard about it has an open source code, so it is almost fully customizable (if that is even a word). I wanna try a Linux-based machine, but I'd like to hear what it is really all about.

_________________
Image
I am 61% addicted to Counterstrike.


Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:51 pm
Profile WWW
Post 
Linux sucks for games. It does have a sharper/smoother images and all. Ive seen my brother use it!


Thu Jul 07, 2005 11:05 pm
Community Owner
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 8643
Location: Southwest Florida
Post 
I like Linux, and I have two machine with it loaded here. One with Fedora Core and one with FreeBSD (not linux, but similar).

The only problem I have is that games aren't built for Linux, and Linux isn't made for games.

_________________
Image


Fri Jul 08, 2005 6:17 am
Profile WWW
[n00b] Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 11:00 pm
Posts: 2961
Location: LittleCock, Arkansas
Post 
i love linux



for servers you cant beat em......they are full open sorce (cept for one version which has sum closed source shit) so its dirt cheap to buy the cds and free to download. it has open office which is an open source office program that is just as good as any of microsofts shit. it runs a lot like a dos system in that you have to type a lot of commands in a consol. also since there are many verisons of it (litterally dozens upon dozens) companies usually dont make drivers for hardware. so google it. and hope sumone has made one. i know personally i couldnt get online with mine till i hardwired my computer because my usb adapter wasnt supported

cons- like they said lack of games
if you suck at learning commands youll have a hard time
configuring your hd for a dual boot system can be fustrating and a bitch
hardware might not be supported



i voted linux btw

_________________
Image

www.xkcd.com best web comic ever


Fri Jul 08, 2005 7:58 am
Profile YIM
[n00b] Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 4626
Location: Lakeland, FUCK!!!
Post 
who the F*CK voted for windows??? u fags.. the only thing windows is good for is games... if that ever changes windows is gone..

_________________
Image
"attempting a Donkey Punch can lead to ... unpleasant outcomes," including "injury, death, or incarceration;" - Sex advice columnist Dan Savage


Fri Jul 08, 2005 3:57 pm
Profile
[HNIC] Stзamroller ω

Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 13453
Post 
Windows is the best operating system the world has ever seen.

Linux is great for servers, but Windows has made MASSIVE improvements in their server technology in the past 5 years.

I've run websites off of windows and linux servers, and I'm going to have to say linux is more sophistocated, but it's also more complex. There's nothing wrong at all with a windows webserver.

For desktop use, I've used Linux before... and let me say, it's a big steaming pile of horse shit. The Linux desktop is not only more complicated (with not much more functionality), but it's just awkward. It would take a lot of customization to make it look sleek or clean-cut like the windows desktop is.

Lots of people on the internet love Linux because there are lots of programmers on the internet, and they're into the huge open-source movement. Open-source is great. It's what allowed the phpbb community to come together and create this forum engine we all use on an almost daily basis; it's what allowed me to customize it without paying anyone for working on it before me.

The difference between open-source programmers and microsoft's programmers, though, is that microsoft's programmers get paid. With php and sql technology (all largely spread through the open-source movement), Joe Blow programmers learn and create new things to do with 'em and share 'em around. With Microsoft's ASP and .NET, people are PAID to think of new and cool shit to do with their code... so (I believe) sooner or later, Microsoft is going to catch up and blow Linux and the open source community out of the water as far as functionality goes.

In a programming enviornment, though, Linux isn't the beauty. Unix is the beauty. Unix is the underlying operating system that Linux was built on. I've programmed unix routers (so has Strange!) from a command-line interface. Hell, a lot of website changes (including the big move in December) was done through the linux shell (command-line) via SSH.

Desktop use: Windows for the win.
Web/Gameserver use: Linux is champ, but Windows isn't far behind at all (especially with all the new .net and ASP technologies that have been coming out)

If you're thinking about installing Linux on your machine, go for it... just dual-boot it. Don't get rid of windows to use Linux, cause a couple days into F*CKING with lin, you'll want the warm tingly feeling windows gives you.

_________________
Image

I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me.
-- Hunter S Thompson


Fri Jul 08, 2005 5:07 pm
Profile WWW
Community Owner
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 8643
Location: Southwest Florida
Post 
I agree with Gemen almost word-for-word on this one, except I don't think Windows wil ever have the raw processing power vs. resources abilities that the *nix breeds get, and that' mainly because of their raw, machine-code-style operating mode. It's just simple, no-nonsense 1's and 0's as fast as the CPU can push them.

Winderz is purdy and useful for home. *nix is for the server machines.

I have an experimental machine that's a dual P3 600 with 512M of ram that will run 3 CZ servers more effectively than my 2.4G P4, 1G of 800mhz RAM machine can run ONE server. But that's only if it's done in text mode with no graphics, and separate terminal screens are used to place the server processes in the background.

When I boot the linux machine to a graphical interface, it sucks ass. Like Gman said, it's more than just "something new to get used to".... it's a hunk of shit interface. That goes for the X system, KDE, ICE and every other graphic interface I've tried. It's "tolerable" at best, and I put up with it because it's a fuckload easier to move and copy and install shit with the interface than in text mode.

Home use? Windows with a F*CKING grand slam home run for XP. Windows XP is the best and most stable installment of the monopoly yet. I just wish it wouldn't require a fresh installation every 8 months to stay running nice and tight. Anyone remember Windows ME? How about 98? 98 was so bad they had to do it twice. And the ever popular Windows 95 with it's constant blue screen of death popping up. I think they should have gone from Windows 3.11 to Windows 98SE to Windows XP. The shit in-between fucked more people than your sister-in-law at the prom.

Linux/Unix blends? Use them at home if you think it'll make you sound cool or turn you into an overnight code-hacking genius. If you're not planning on running a server or experimenting with running a server... you're wasting your F*CKING time just trying to look cool. Unless.... you just love the challenge of something new, and you like to be different.....

_________________
Image


Fri Jul 08, 2005 6:15 pm
Profile WWW
[n00b] Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 11:00 pm
Posts: 2961
Location: LittleCock, Arkansas
Post 
i like that last line corpse.....

i personally like learning new things with technology. and linux is just sumthing else to do with your time, and what im currently messing with

i also hate microsoft with a passion. (along with aol, websense, mpaa, and the riaa.....the last 2 have more F*CKING power then the gvt.)

_________________
Image

www.xkcd.com best web comic ever


Fri Jul 08, 2005 9:31 pm
Profile YIM
[n00b] Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 2649
Post 
it sux to have to say it, but Windows for the win! yay.

If the only thing I used my computer for was graphics, or surfing the web...then linux is the pwnzor.

But the reason for the internet is information, interactivity.
Not everyone has Linux.
Linux has some nice features, and with the open-source you can find downloads for things like software dvd players ( or plugins ), chat server stuff, ( I really only use Yahoo Instant Messeger ) btw: the YIM for linux doesn't support webcam...at least not now....that blows!

It took me forever to configure plugins for the linux media player, but I got that to work, which was nice. I watch all my movies on my computer.
The linux insallation that I had which was SUSE 9.2 also has an mp3 player that works nice too. no problem there.

But damn!! try to install something....OMG! it takes forever.
I guess it's because I'm so use to Windows...I can recognize all the icons, and there uses.

Games....I tried to use Caldera ( WHICH MAKES YOU INSTALL WINDOWS ANYWAYS ) but would allow you to play games on your linux machine.
sux dix....I couldn't get it to work....that was the only thing that made me go back to W2k ( yeah, I'm a big Windows 2000 pro fan ) sorry but Windows XP sucks up too many recources...and reminds me of windows 98se.

If I could play my games, and use YIM to view the webcam in linux....windows would be dead to me....mwah ha ha ha ha ha !!!!!!111


Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:56 pm
Profile
[HNIC] Stзamroller ω

Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 13453
Post 
LordCleavage wrote:
i also hate microsoft with a passion.


Why? Everyone says, "OMG I H8 WINDOZE LOL!!" but nobody has any reason to back it up. They always throw out bullshit monopoly lines or bullshit security lines.

You know what? So what if Microsoft is a monopoly? There's nothing illegal about having a monopoly as long as you're fair to competition and follow all of the nice little trade laws that protect us consumers. Microsoft is doing that; they're doing a great job of staying within the bounds of the law. I believe that if someone works their ass off and makes a badass product that everyone falls in love with, they deserve to reap the benefits of it. Since this is the closest thing to a free world we've seen since the caveman days, you've got the right to bitch about it for no reason... so I'll allow it.

As far as security goes, I have this statement to offer:

Your windows machines wouldn't be hacked/exploited/infected if your firewalls in your unix-based routers did their job correctly.


(owned)

_________________
Image

I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me.
-- Hunter S Thompson


Sat Jul 09, 2005 2:43 pm
Profile WWW
[n00b] Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 2649
Post 
screw it!!!!
I'm going for round 2
I subscribed to cedega, and I'm going to setup my other computer for suse linux 9.2 or mandrake....havent decided yet.

I'll let n00bfest know if I have any success storys.
or if I get frustrated again, and run outside in the hurricane force winds with my C*CK and nuts dangling out screaming " Why!!!!11"

or just sleep on it.


Sat Jul 09, 2005 3:36 pm
Profile
[n00b] Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 11:00 pm
Posts: 2961
Location: LittleCock, Arkansas
Post 
why do i hate windows


1) you need a fresh install every few months to keep it running smooth (even with scanners and whatnot)

2) it always crashes when your in the middle of sumthing important

3) the security flaws

4) ive gotten it pretty much figured out and its boring

5) wmp is a form of spyware

6) a lot of the hardware/software is shit

7) it has a very limited amount of customability (well sames goes for linux)...sure colors are nice, and sum themes but meh

8) they buy out competition because they cant program there own shit

9) ie is so intergrated in to the system that if it crashes you computer can crash

10) they run up prices because people who want to buy a lisense have to do it from microsoft, this is figured in iwth prices, thus making shit higher priced

11) they constantly tell about shit thats comming out years in advance to keep people waiting, then when it finally hits its a peice of shit

12) whenever sumone takes em to court they can keep the case going long enough to the point where the person who took em cant afford to keep going.

13) that F*CKING paper clip in word

14) many times while working on shit for school, or playing a game my computer has crashed for no apperant reason

_________________
Image

www.xkcd.com best web comic ever


Sat Jul 09, 2005 3:39 pm
Profile YIM
[n00b] Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 2649
Post 
maybe your hitting the keys with your cleavage.

I wonder if I can hit ctrl + alt + del with my nipples.

p.s. I agree with reason #9

top 10 computer uses

1. Photoshop = Gimp
2. Windows Media Player = Kaffine
3. Divx = plugins available for Kaffine
4. Games = Cedega...TBA
5. YIM = available for linux and windows = (only 1 flaw webcam access)
6. Microsoft Office = Linux has everything you need for free
7. Webpage design = same programming applies
8. Surfing the Web (ie) = Firefox (it's ok) I can still post here!!! woot!
9. Winamp = better one for Linux (cant remember the name though):P
10. Nero; Easy CD creator; etc. = all kinds of dvd burning and editing programs available for free in linux.


Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:37 pm
Profile
Forum Newbie

Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2005 11:00 pm
Posts: 6
Post 13) that F*CKING paper clip in word
HAHAHAHA Funny shit!


Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:55 pm
Profile
Spammer Hopeful
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 12, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 470
Location: My fro's ZipCode is 069.42
Post 
Yeah, I was thinking about having both OSs on the new machine just incase, but my only concern is that if I wanna use Linux to its full power, then I think the XP installment will take up lots of space and, how you say, hold back the potential of Linux.

_________________
Image
I am 61% addicted to Counterstrike.


Sat Jul 09, 2005 5:07 pm
Profile WWW
[n00b] Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 11:00 pm
Posts: 2961
Location: LittleCock, Arkansas
Post 
partition your hd and go for a dual or even trip boot.

just make sure if your computer came with an xp cd to install it first since it looks the the c drive

_________________
Image

www.xkcd.com best web comic ever


Sat Jul 09, 2005 5:45 pm
Profile YIM
Game Server Admin
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 5609
Location: Yo mama's room, Bitch!
Post 
Cleavage, what do you use on your computer?

_________________
Image

icemaN: i was droppin wards like they were turds


Sat Jul 09, 2005 6:02 pm
Profile
[n00b] Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 11:00 pm
Posts: 2961
Location: LittleCock, Arkansas
Post 
i have a dual boot with suse 9.3 (linux) and windows xp


i fucked up when i partitioned and was going for a trip boot with win 2k as well but had a power surge and it fucked it to hell


so now ive got 4 partitions and only 2 os's loaded (though part is a swap partition)....when i get time ima format the unformated to win 2k if i can


also if you go with suse 9.3 you can partition it from there

win 2k also has a partition thing on it so its personal preference....

the only differance is if you use the windows partition you choose your os in the black and white screen, and if you use the linux you choose it from a linux screen.....same concept with only moving the mouse and hitting enter its just the background that is differant

with the linux 9.3 you get 2 diff boots at the menu......normal, and fail safe (safemode....only differance from win is that you dont have to hit f8 to get to it)

(180 gig hd

_________________
Image

www.xkcd.com best web comic ever


Sat Jul 09, 2005 7:34 pm
Profile YIM
[n00b] Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 12:00 am
Posts: 926
Location: Harlem New York
Post 
No i would think Mac is the best OS anyone has ever seen and with the new Os they are coming out with you will be able to use any type of windows software in a Mac:) Mac is the most stable and fastest Os out. Did you know you could leave a Mac on for 1 year st8 without any type of an error even if you installed you drivers????? i think thats F*CKIN hott as F*CK. Also Why the F*CK is Windows on Dos still!!!??? they need to build windows up from the starting i think its time...

I dont hate Windows but i do think if it had the things Mac had it would be the best Os ever. Did you know Bill Gates is trying to buy Mac so he could leave Dos and use Macs Operating system through Windows...

_________________
Image


Sat Jul 09, 2005 8:10 pm
Profile
n00bfest Ancient, Senior Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 3519
Post 
http://www.phlak.org/modules/mydownloads/

Version of linux thats is bootable from a CD no install needed good way to start learning

_________________
Government exists to protect us from each other. Where government has gone beyond its limits is in deciding to protect us from ourselves.

Man is not free unless government is limited.

The most terrifying words in the English language are: I'm from the government and I'm here to help.

The problem is not that people are taxed too little, the problem is that government spends too much.

We should measure welfare's success by how many people leave welfare, not by how many are added.


Sun Jul 10, 2005 11:42 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 102 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.