n00bfest.com
Home Forum phpBB3 Shoutbox Servers Teamspeak Admins Donate FAQ
Sign Up
Stats Contact Us!

 

View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Jul 21, 2026 10:50 am



Reply to topic  [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 New Song - Gone 
Author Message
[n00b] Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 11:00 pm
Posts: 5727
Location: Dakota, North
Post Re: New Song - Gone
Kwang! wrote:
Bleep wrote:
You know what your right, go ahead and enjoy mediocrity. Isn't that what that list of corporate leaders would like you to do?

it's a matter of simplicity.

If it was truly a simplistic song, why defend in such large proportions?

_________________
Image


Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:08 am
Profile
[n00b] Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:11 pm
Posts: 1736
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Post Re: New Song - Gone
Kwang! wrote:
Bleep wrote:
You know what your right, go ahead and enjoy mediocrity. Isn't that what that list of corporate leaders would like you to do?


It's not a matter of mediocrity, it's a matter of simplicity.

If I wanted this particular song to be of a complex or intricate nature, I would have written something like this:

viewtopic.php?f=104&t=44530 which quite clearly demonstrates that I know the difference between this and something that you're attempting to say is a 'more valid form of expression'.


I guess I'm wrong.......in only assuming this to be the only simple and straightforward piece you have made. Idk honestly that other poem just seemed more serious just by the matter of which it speaks. In terms of it having depth or anything that'd make a song/poem interesting, it is wanting. I feel like depth and all those wonderful things come from allusion and word play (among other things), simply rhyming or speaking in a serious tone doesn't make a song/poem deep or w.e your going for. I think you need to stop taking poetry lessons from William McGonagall and try to put some effort into your work. Otherwise they are just pointless posts.

_________________
Image Image
Rokatanski wrote:
I F*CKING love you.


Sat Jun 02, 2012 3:13 am
Profile
[n00b] Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 6:04 pm
Posts: 4413
Location: Here.
Post Re: New Song - Gone
Bleep wrote:
Kwang! wrote:
Bleep wrote:
You know what your right, go ahead and enjoy mediocrity. Isn't that what that list of corporate leaders would like you to do?


It's not a matter of mediocrity, it's a matter of simplicity.

If I wanted this particular song to be of a complex or intricate nature, I would have written something like this:

viewtopic.php?f=104&t=44530 which quite clearly demonstrates that I know the difference between this and something that you're attempting to say is a 'more valid form of expression'.


I guess I'm wrong.......in only assuming this to be the only simple and straightforward piece you have made. Idk honestly that other poem just seemed more serious just by the matter of which it speaks. In terms of it having depth or anything that'd make a song/poem interesting, it is wanting. I feel like depth and all those wonderful things come from allusion and word play (among other things), simply rhyming or speaking in a serious tone doesn't make a song/poem deep or w.e your going for. I think you need to stop taking poetry lessons from William McGonagall and try to put some effort into your work. Otherwise they are just pointless posts.


Who the F*CK is William McGonagall? It might help that I don't read much poetry and I'm hardly attempting to be clever with wordplay. It is obviously straight to the point, and I like it that way.

_________________
Image


Sun Jun 03, 2012 2:29 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 23 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.